But, some may be more palatable than others. And you must be able to pay for them for a long time. Ok, you don't get the ability to have a standing professional army until you can pay for them. Not that a trade-state can´t work, but if you work that way you will at best have merchant families instead of nobles, no more centralization and still be in pretty much the same boat, What the crown needs to do is rather to increase the land it controls directly (Dany or Aegon taking direct control over Stormlands is an excellent idea since this time they can get away with it if they win) and gain access to the means of production rather than assist a economical group without the same military muscle to do the work for them. In fact, I would argue that it is far easier for a complete monster to collect taxes - after all, everyone knows what will happen if you don´t pay. After all - everyone always think they pay "too much already" and that this should already be included. Just look on the society today and the lack of willingness to provide for extra security and better courts. No government can exist without supreme force of arms.Īnother problem is that there rarely is a consent about collecting taxes from someone. Simply supporting the merchants won´t be enough to weaken the nobles by itself since they own vast lands and fortunes and have the ability to maintain a feudal grip simply by being there (and as pointed out above, they wont sit idle). While I agree that the ability to tax and finance is important, I claim a necessary step is to weaken the power of the feudal lords, in particular the ability to raise personal armies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |